"Campaigners" are worried that chocolate makers are indirectly funding wars in Africa and want them to print on their labels where they buy their cocoa so that consumers can make sure they're buying "conflict-free chocolate."
I'm rather glad that I have an aversion to sweets. It saves me from a good deal of silliness. If a government wishes to impose a trade embargo on a country engaged in hostilities, that is perfectly reasonable. If a pressure group wishes to boycott a company to change its purchasing policies, that is their right. But when said pressure group expects a company to participate in a boycott against itself, that is where we part brass rags.
Labels: Africa, Food