|
An
everyday story of post- apocalyptic country folk.
Survivors*
is a late entry in the "quiet catastrophe" stakes
that follows a band of, well, survivors after a Red Chinese scientist
accidentally unleashes a deadly
biowarfare virus on the world. Quickly spread
by modern air travel, the disease soon takes hold in every country on
Earth and within three weeks the world's population has collapsed by a
factor of 5000. In Britain, only 10,000 people remain alive out
of a population of 50 million. The corpse-filled cities have
become hopeless pockets of disease, leaving the survivors scattered
and alone in the countryside.
From this atomised state, the remnants of mankind
have to come together again to form new communities and rebuild
society from scratch. What complicates this is that the passing
of the old world took with it all the industrial infrastructure on
which we all depend for our most basic needs. Before they
realise it, the last Britons have been flung back into an agrarian
world where simply getting enough food to eat is a daily struggle and
a bar of soap is a luxury.
Created
by writer Terry Nation (father of the Daleks) and aired on BBC1 from
1975 to 1977, Survivors initially followed Abby Grant, a
banker's wife who loses her husband in the plague and sets off in
search of her young son, whom she believes against all odds to be
alive. Teaming up with engineer Grant Preston and young Jenny
Richards, we are taken along as they encounter other survivors who are
coping with the new world they've found themselves in; some trying to
make a new start, others seeing it as a chance for power.
Eventually, our heroes abandon the search and
settle down in a stately home surrounded by
farm land that serves as the nucleus for a
new community. As new people come and go and the community faces
disasters without even basics like
home insurance,
such as when a fire forces those who survive it to move to new
location, the stories revolve around the problems of not just staying
alive, but how to deal with crime and criminals, fulfilling people's
spiritual needs, the up-welling of superstition, and simple
difficulties of holding the group together in the face of hardship and
isolation.
But
it isn't all grim. In fact, though it's rarely acknowledged, the
post-Death world has a lot to offer. The bucolic existence that
the survivors must adapt to is much more peaceful
and even beautiful compared to the old
days and for some it affords a new lease on life, though others
literally pine to death remembering when there were football matches
and families were intact.
In many ways, Survivors is one of hardest of
hard science fiction futures ever imagined
on television. Once the Death is out
of the way, the problems faced are very solid and down to earth
without a hint of fantasy. Viewers of
the 21st century
remake with its hysterical
running about, intrigue,
mysterious scientists, and virus
that acts like a Mexican jumping bean will be surprised at how many
plots in the original revolve around where to keep the pigs and trying
to buy rubber boots. Everything from potatoes to beer to salt
poses problems for our heroes that they have to overcome and all of
them involve solutions that wouldn't be out of place in a farmer's
almanac and none include sinister helicopters and evil pharmaceutical
executives in evil suits and evil ties
attending evil meetings.
In fact, the series often managed to produce that "ambiguity" that the
remake strove for, but never managed to hit by miles. Some of
the episodes could make one genuinely angry–and not, for a change,
because of a kack-handed director.

The refreshing thing about Survivors was
that it not only dealt with the prospects of living in a world without
all those other people about, but also gave a window into the mindset
of 1970s Britain–or, at least, the mindset of 1970s British television
writers. One episode,
for example, dealt
with our heroes'
attempts to forge a new morality and somehow squaring
the circle between hedonism,
Feminism,
the then-current attitude of deference toward adolescence,
and the messy business of having babies
to perpetuate the species. Seen from
perspective of the 21st century, when we've had thirty years to live
with the fallout of the '60s that include
everything from from rampant STDs to a generation of bastards to
demographic suicide, their deliberations
are less like
witnessing people building a new world and more like watching someone
walking blindly into a very large buzz
saw and knowing full well that the outcome
does not in any way rise to becoming
an object of suspense.
At times, Survivors
was sort of a sombre version of
The Good Life–which
isn't surprising because both shows owe a lot to the self-sufficiency
fad that cropped up in the wake of the Energy Crisis. It
even has the characters adopting herbalism and homeopathy with no
reservation whatsoever.
Granted, the writers do overestimate how fast
the groceries will run out, but chalk that up to poetic licence and
budget restrictions. They wanted to show a world forced to fall
back on its most basic resources, but couldn't afford to show one that
had declined for a generation and they couldn't realistically deal
with characters a couple of decades divorced from our world and keep
up the drama. Besides, it's the building rather than the decline
that's the real story.
And well it should be.
|