|
Robots are one of those
predictions that always seemed to be a slam dunk dead cert; at least,
as far as the basics were concerned. Sure, there might be some
tricky bits to work
out when it came to making a machine that could speak or do maths, but
no one was expecting miracles. One that could walk, carry trays,
drive cars, or go on a rampage of destruction when commanded would do
just fine. If you look through the popular science articles from
the '20s right up to the present day you'll find legions of articles
confidently predicting that we'd have robot servants and companions
within a decade, no problem. Unfortunately, the decades keep
rolling by and I still don't have a decent 'bot to call my own.
 |
|
You can see just in this photo how the tortoise
managed to find its way into its hutch to get an electric snack.
|
Not
that there was a lack of trying. From the 1940s on there has
been a tremendous amount of work being done in cybernetics and
robotics. Take the case, for example, of Elmer
and Elsie. The creation of the pioneer cyberneticist Grey
Walters, They were one of the first true robots ever built:
Machina Speculatrix.
These robotic "tortoises" used a simple mechanism of photoelectric
cells, motors, touch sensors, and relays to produce remarkably
animal-like behaviour.
Elmer and Elsie would
roll about the floor in search of light, which they were attracted to.
They were also repelled by light that was too strong, so they would
run toward open lights, then turn away, then circle back. They
would dance about like this until their batteries ran down, at which
point their aversion to light would be overcome by "hunger" and they
would race back to the lighted charger in their "hutch" for a quick
electric meal.
 |
|
You can see in this one how some people took up with the idea and
ran with it. Any day now houses across America were expected
to be overrun with electronic pests mooching off of mains sockets
and running around with scissors. Somehow this is less like
an advancement than a visit by my relatives. |
This sort of thing
made engineers optimistic about the chances for making true robots,
but the goal has kept eluding them ever since. Thing is, robots
are trickier affairs than we thought. A lot of the things that
were thought to be easy to do were actually very hard and a lot of
things that were thought hard turned out to be relatively easy.
Contrary to popular science and science fiction, getting a robot to
speak or do arithmetic isn't the hard part.
Heck, the theoretical
roots of computing were already pretty far along by the time of
Charles Babbage back in the 1830s and things like playing chess and
the like were inherently logical, which made stating and solving the
problem less daunting than it seemed. On the other hand, things
like walking, picking up objects, or even building a robot that could
see and understand what was going on around it are extremely difficult
because they have to take into account so many variables and so much
which is inherently vague. We think that standing, for
instance, is easy, but doing square roots is hard. That's only
because standing is something that we do literally by reflex through
long practice and evolution, while doing square roots requires a good
deal of training and practice to develop the necessary skills.
It turns out, however, that the mechanics of arithmetic are nothing
but simple logical steps that a machine can easily follow, while
standing is an intricate balancing act that requires constant
correction and counter correction merely to stay still, never mind
move.
In 1940, Isaac Asimov
wrote a story in which a robot was built as a nursemaid for an
eight-year old girl. The robot could play hide and seek, pretend
to be an aeroplane, appreciate stories, recognise different
individuals, and understand colloquial English, but because it was
"primitive" it couldn't speak. Meanwhile, an "advanced" robot
that could speak was, in fact, a great collection of immobile
electronic boxes that could barely manage the job of a "speak and
spell" because speech is "hard." I can't think of any engineer
that wouldn't take the primitive robot over the advanced one any day. |